Talk to a lawyer now — free case review
Get clear guidance on your employment situation — severance, wrongful dismissal and your rights. No appointment, confidential.
Runs in your browser · free · confidential
Our services
Process
Our technical procedure begins with a detailed case assessment, reviewing your employment agreement, company redundancy policy, and all communications related to the dismissal. We analyse compliance with the Employment Relations Act 2000, particularly sections 103A (justification for dismissal) and 4 (good faith), which are paramount. For instance, we scrutinise whether the redundancy was genuine and whether the consultation process, which must be meaningful, was followed. We then quantify your claim, which can include compensation for lost wages (typically up to 3 months' remuneration), hurt and humiliation, and any unpaid entitlements. Our approach is methodical, building a robust evidential file to support negotiation or, if necessary, litigation in the Employment Relations Authority, where over 90% of personal grievance claims are resolved.
At a Glance
| Parameter | Reference Value |
|---|---|
| Typical Case Resolution Timeline | 8-16 weeks |
| Primary Governing Legislation | Employment Relations Act 2000 |
| Common Claim for Unjustified Dismissal | 3 months' lost wages + compensation |
| Personal Grievance Filing Deadline | 90 days from dismissal |
Local Considerations — New Zealand
Severance scenarios for HR managers vary across New Zealand's economic landscape. In Auckland's competitive corporate sector, redundancies often involve complex corporate restructures and higher-value settlements, requiring precise analysis of long-term incentives and confidential information. In Wellington, where public sector and policy roles are concentrated, dismissals must be meticulously aligned with State Sector Act principles and collective agreements. Christchurch's rebuild-driven market has seen its own patterns of post-project redundancies. Our national practice is adept in these regional nuances, ensuring our advice is context-specific whether dealing with a multinational in Auckland or a government agency in Wellington. We provide tailored severance pay advice for HR managers across these key centres.
Request a Quote
Our team reviews your project and issues an initial report at no cost.
Or write us directly at info@employmentlawyer24.org
Standards & Compliance
- Employment Relations Act 2000
- Good Faith Obligations (ERA, s4)
- Personal Grievance Provisions (ERA, s103)
- Holidays Act 2003
Frequently Asked Questions
What constitutes a justified redundancy for an HR manager?
A redundancy is justified if the employer's decision to disestablish the role is genuine, based on reasonable business grounds, and a fair and proper process is followed. For HR managers, this requires demonstrable evidence that the duties are no longer required and that any selection process was objective and consulted upon in good faith, as per sections 4 and 103A of the Employment Relations Act 2000.
Can I challenge a redundancy if I believe the process was unfair?
Yes. If the employer failed to consult meaningfully, did not provide relevant information, or acted in a manner that breached mutual trust and confidence, the dismissal may be found unjustified. This forms grounds for a personal grievance claim seeking remedies such as reinstatement, reimbursement of lost wages, and compensation for humiliation.
How long does a severance dispute typically take to resolve?
Most cases resolved through direct negotiation or mediation take 8-16 weeks from instruction. If proceedings are filed with the Employment Relations Authority, a determination can take 6-12 months, depending on complexity and court schedules. Our goal is to achieve an efficient, favourable settlement without unnecessary delay.
How much does severance pay advice for HR managers in New Zealand cost?
Costs depend entirely on case complexity, the volume of documentation, and whether mediation or authority proceedings are required. For straightforward advice and negotiation, fees are typically lower. For contested litigation, costs increase accordingly. We provide transparent upfront estimates and often work on a fixed-fee basis for initial stages. The best approach is to request a specific cost proposal for your situation.